Conan Doyle and Ronald Dahl Essay Example for Free

Conan Doyle and Ronald Dahl EssayIn this essay I am going to examine the devil stories by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and Ronald Dahl, The Speckled Band and Lambs to the mass murder. I will do so by comparing, contrasting, and explaining what the two writers ar trying to say in each report card because both stories ar in truth different simply both are the same genre. I will also explain what a genre is, and extend to examples of their m either types. I will start with The Speckled Band by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. The drool contains matchless of the near famous fictional detectives the world has ever known, Sherlock Holmes. This character was created by Sir Arthur and surfaced in 1887 in dainty clips.The Victorians solely fell for the fictional character because crime was high in London at this time no one was safe. They also liked the character because he cracked every case and continuously defeated evil. When Doyle tried to kill of the character in 1893, there was a p ublic outcry and Doyle received death threats warning him to keep Holmes alive. The language used is first person and it seems like the story is aimed at a type of upper class because it uses more sophisticated words for intelligent people. Where as Lambs to the Slaughter is third person and it is aimed at average people with average intellectual.Dahl has made it that way because this is his style. This makes the story easier to read. The Speckled Band begins with a very long opening paragraph and this is just to explain the chance and setting. The story starts with Watson explaining how many cases him and Holmes have got to deal with and this lasts for 9 lines which is unusual for an opening designate. This doesnt give the story any atmosphere, suspense or tension and its really up to you if that little bit mint make you requisite to read on. They usually are short to give you an instant view of what is going on.Dr Watson is telling the story and he is one of Holmess assistant s and probably best friend, who help him with cases. He looks up to Holmes and admires him, he is devoted to him. In Lambs to the Slaughter it starts by giving you the setting and the mood of the story straight away by byword The room was warm and clean, the curtains drawn, the two table lamps alight hers and the one by the empty chair opposite. This gives you an ikon in your head of exactly what the room looks like and how it feels and you can tell this all from the first sentence This adds to the atmosphere.Another character in this is Dr Grimesby Roylott who is the other main character in the story and he is the villain. Dr Roylott comes crosswise as a very strong, aggressive and nasty man. Not one to mess with. This is a form of address people have given him because of past criminal offences, selfish, evil, uncivilised, rude behaviour, greed for financial gain, his brutality towards women and his shake expressions of his savage, primitive nature (i. e. his mania, violent te mper and physical cruelty). Even before Dr Roylott enters the story you get a picture of what type of man he is when Helen Stoner comes to Holmes for help and protection.This is where we hear most of the things about him. That he has uncontrollable anger, terrifying power to intimidate and threaten, etc. Holmes and Watson have the job of consoling Miss Stoner. With his appearance he is a huge man with brown hair down to the shoulder and blood convey eyes. He also has very large hands. Three words I would use to describe him are intelligent, cunning and aggressive. He also isolates him self from the outside world and I think thats another agent why people are suspicious of him. This is every different from the villain in Lambs to the Slaughter.Mrs Mary Maloney is the very nice and pleasant wife for her husband. She does everything he ask of him, has the dinner on the table each dark when he comes in at five oclock. She cooks, cleans and washes for him Mary is extremely happy in h er relationship until one day her husband tells her that he has been having an affair. She decides to take it as a dream at first and believes if she carries on as normal she might have imagined it. So she goes down to the cellar to get the meat for supper. As she comes back up he says, For Gods sake, dont make me supper Im going out and at that moment without any hiatus she simply walked up behind him, swung the leg of lamb high in the air and brought it down as hard as she could on his head. The mysterious thing about these two villains is that when Dr Roylott gets caught for the murder of Miss Stoners babe you feel happy and glad that he has been rightly accused and he deserves what he gets The twist is that when Mrs Maloney gets completely away with the murder of her husband you get a sense of feeling that pleases you because even though she has through with(p) wrong and should be punished.She has been calm and cunning about the situation and handled it well. Its as if you wa nt her to get away with it Out of the two Stories I prefer Lambs to the Slaughter because it is easier to read and understand but I like both because a lot of thought has gone into the plot and that makes it more interesting. Show preview wholly The above preview is unformatted text This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Arthur Conan Doyle section.